cover image
IPS-Integrated Project Services

IPS-Integrated Project Services

www.ipsdb.com

2 Jobs

3,825 Employees

About the Company

IPS-Integrated Project Services, LLC, a Berkshire Hathaway company, is a global leader in developing innovative solutions for the consulting, architecture, engineering, project controls, procurement, construction management, and CQV of technically complex facilities. With technical expertise spanning R&D to pilot-scale to large-scale production, our team specializes in the technology, trends, and regulatory environment to successfully deliver capital projects and improve operations that enable our clients to deliver life-impacting products worldwide. Headquartered in Pennsylvania, IPS is a multinational company with professionals and offices in the United States, Canada, Brazil, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Germany, Denmark, Switzerland, Australia, Singapore, China, and India. With the acquisition of Linesight, IPS has over 3,000 professionals in 45+ offices across 17 countries. Linesight specializes in cost, schedule, risk, program, and project management services in various market sectors, including data centers, life sciences, and high-tech industrial.

Listed Jobs

Company background Company brand
Company Name
IPS-Integrated Project Services
Job Title
Project Manager
Job Description
Job Title: Project Manager Role Summary: Oversees end‑to‑end delivery of life‑sciences manufacturing facility projects, ensuring scope, cost, schedule, and quality objectives are met while coordinating engineering functions, client interactions, and resource allocation. Expections: Deliver projects within defined scope, budget, and timeline; manage risks; maintain client relationships; contribute to business development and proposal preparation; enforce safety and project control standards. Key Responsibilities: - Lead project teams to achieve scope, cost, schedule, and quality targets. - Conduct pre‑bid meetings, develop proposals, and support new business development. - Identify, assess, and mitigate project risks in partnership with senior leadership. - Manage scope control, issue change notifications, and update stakeholders. - Prepare and maintain project documentation: meeting minutes, action items, execution plans, monthly financial/schedule reports, and client‑requested deliverables. - Coordinate engineering functions and recommend manpower/technical resource loading. - Ensure adherence to safety policies for IPS and clients across field sites. - Travel to project locations as required; operate in safety‑sensitive environments. Required Skills: - Proven project management experience (7+ years total, 5+ in PM role). - Strong knowledge of Earned Value Management and other project controls. - Experience in construction and life‑sciences manufacturing facility design. - Excellent stakeholder communication and client‑facing skills. - Risk management, scope control, and reporting proficiency. - Commitment to safety protocols and compliance. Required Education & Certifications: - Bachelor’s degree in Engineering, Construction Management, or related discipline (or equivalent technical degree). - Valid PMP, Prince2, or equivalent project management certification preferred.
Hainaut, Belgium
On site
Senior
20-12-2025
Company background Company brand
Company Name
IPS-Integrated Project Services
Job Title
Quantity Surveyor I
Job Description
<think> Okay, let's tackle this query step by step. The user wants me to normalize a job description into a concise mini-job profile for job matching. The key points are to keep it under 500 words, exclude company details, location, benefits, and fluff. They want only specific sections: Job Title, Role Summary, Expectations, Key Responsibilities, Required Skills, Required Education & Certifications. It needs to be factual, ATS-friendly, and globally neutral. First, I'll start with the job title. The given title is "Quantity Surveyor I" which is already clear, so I'll keep that as is. Next, the Role Summary. The original job description is quite detailed. I need to distill it down to a concise summary. The main role is assisting with the contractual and financial aspects of construction projects, ensuring projects stay within budget. They also mention valuation of works, budgeting, and reporting. The summary should capture the essence without company-specific fluff. For Expectations, the user wants what the role demands. The job requires 2-5 years of experience and knowledge of ARM4 & ARM5. These should be in the Expectations section. Preferred qualifications like MEP knowledge or contract types like FIDIC might go under Required Skills or another category depending on how important they are. Key Responsibilities need to be a list of the main tasks. The original lists many, such as preparing budgets, supporting cost management programs, working with project managers, maintaining files, evaluating historical data, monitoring contracts, engaging with partners, reviewing design costs, maintaining industry relationships, preparing reports, special projects, etc. I'll need to condense these into bullet points, grouping similar tasks where possible. Required Skills: The user listed written/verbal communication, interpersonal skills, attention to detail, analytical thinking, initiative, numerical/data analysis, problem-solving, IT skills, teamwork, resilience, organizational skills, commercial awareness, logical approach, and knowledge of construction tech and legal matters. I should present these concisely, maybe in bullet points or as a short paragraph. Education and Certifications: Bachelor’s in Quantity Surveying or related field, or equivalent technical degree. That's straightforward. Now, checking for ATS-friendliness: use common keywords like Quantity Surveyor, construction projects, budget management, cost control, contract administration, procurement. Avoid any company jargon or unique terms unless they're standard. Global neutrality: Ensure terms are understandable in any country. For example, "Trade Partners" is okay if it's a standard term in the field. Also, make sure to use globally recognized certifications if mentioned, like FIDIC, NEC, JCT, but the user said to exclude fluff, so maybe include them as preferred qualifications. Wait, the original mentions knowledge of RIAI, FIDIC, NEC, JCT Contracts. But under Required Education, it's a bachelor's. Should these contracts be in Required Skills or Preferences? The user said Required Skills, Required Education, and Certifications. Certifications might cover certifications like these contracts, but they're more contractual knowledge than certifications. Hmm. The education is a bachelor's, so these could be listed under Required Skills as "Knowledge of RIAI, FIDIC, NEC, JCT Contracts" if they're required. Wait, the original says "Preferred Qualifications" for Exposure to MEP and Knowledge of those contracts. The user's instructions say to exclude fluff, but the Required Skills section should include what's necessary. However, the Required Education is already covered. So perhaps the contract knowledge should go under Required Skills or maybe as Optional (Preferred). Since the user says to exclude fluff, maybe only include what's actually required. The original job description says "Preferred Qualifications" for the contracts, so they might be in the Required Skills or Preferred. Since the user wants "Required Skills", I should note that the contracts are preferred. Therefore, perhaps in Required Skills, mention the contracts as preferred, but only include the ones that are required. Wait, the Required Skills section is where the must-have skills go. The user's example might have both required and preferred, but the instructions say to exclude fluff. Let me check the user's example again. The user provided an example output where they included both required and preferred in the Required Skills section. Wait, in the example under Required Skills, it's a combination. Maybe the user wants all necessary skills, including preferred as optional. But the user's instruction says "Required Skills", so perhaps only the mandatory ones. Let me check the original job description: under Qualifications & Requirements, the Required are 2-5 years, knowledge of ARM4 & ARM5. Preferred qualifications include MEP and contract knowledge. So in the Required Skills, the required ones are ARM4 and ARM5. The preferred ones (FIDIC, NEC, JCT) would go under a separate section, but the user didn't ask for a Preferred Skills section. Wait, the user's Output Only structure includes Required Skills, Required Education & Certifications. So the contracts like RIAI, FIDIC, NEC, JCT would be part of Required Skills only if they're required. Since in the job description, they're in Preferred Qualifications, they might not be required. Therefore, perhaps omit them from Required Skills, but the user might expect them to be there. Hmm. This is a bit ambiguous. To be safe, since the user said to keep it factual and ATS-friendly, perhaps include those contract knowledges as required skills if they are actually required. But according to the job description, they are Preferred. Therefore, maybe they should not be included in Required Skills. Alternatively, the user might prefer to include all mentioned skills under Required Skills even if they are preferred. This is a bit tricky. Let me check the instructions again: "Required Skills" and "Required Education & Certifications". The user probably wants to separate what's required vs preferred. Since the contracts are under Preferred Qualifications, maybe they should be in a separate section, but the user didn't specify a Preferred Skills section. Therefore, perhaps omit them from Required Skills and only include them as a note or in the Required Skills as optional. But the user says to exclude fluff and keep it concise. Maybe leave them out unless the job description explicitly states they are required. The job description says "Knowledge of RIAI, FIDIC, NEC, JCT Contracts" under Preferred Qualifications. So they are not required. Therefore, they might be omitted from Required Skills. However, the user might want to include all mentioned skills under Required Skills for ATS compatibility. Alternatively, the Required Skills could list the core skills, and the Preferred as a separate bullet. But the user didn't specify that. Hmm. Also, the user mentions "Exclude company details, location, benefits, or fluff." The original job description mentions being part of a global company in life sciences, but that's fluff for the purpose of job matching here. The role summary should focus on the job specifics. In the original, the Key Responsibilities include preparation of service and constructed cost management control budgets, supporting cost management programs, working with Project Executives, maintaining files, evaluating historical data, monitoring contracts, engaging with partners, reviewing design cost options, maintaining industry relationships, preparing reports, special projects, etc. In the role summary, I should have a concise sentence that captures the role's essence. For example: "Assists with contractual and financial aspects of construction projects, ensuring cost compliance and accurate reporting." Expectations: 2-5 years relevant industry experience, knowledge of ARM4 & ARM5. Key Responsibilities: bullet points of main tasks. Required Skills: communication, interpersonal, attention to detail, analytical, problem-solving, IT skills, teamwork, resilience, organizational skills, knowledge of construction tech and legal matters. Education: Bachelor’s in Quantity Surveying or related field. Now, compiling all these into the structure the user wants. Let me check for any missing points. The user's example includes "Expected Years of Experience" which in this case is 2-5 years. The original job description also mentions exposure to MEP and knowledge of the contracts as preferred. Since those are under Preferred Qualifications, perhaps they can be mentioned in a separate Required Skills section, but the user's instructions don't include a Preferred section. Therefore, perhaps just include the required ones. Also, the job description mentions "Knowledge of ARM4 & ARM5" under Qualifications & Requirements, so those should be in Required Skills. The preferred ones (MEP, FIDIC, etc.) can be omitted unless they're considered essential for ATS purposes. However, according to the job description, they are preferred, not required. The user might be looking for all necessary skills, but the instruction is to exclude fluff. Since the user wants the role to be ATS-friendly, including all relevant keywords is important. For example, if the job requires knowledge of FIDIC contracts, they should be in Required Skills. But since in the job description they are under Preferred, perhaps they are not required. This is a bit of a judgment call. Given the user wants a factual, concise profile, I'll stick to the required ones and omit the preferred unless they're necessary. The user might prefer to include them in a separate bullet as "Preferred: knowledge of RIAI, FIDIC, NEC, JCT Contracts", but since the user's structure doesn't include a "Preferred" section, perhaps it's better to omit them to stay within the required format and avoid fluff. So, finalizing each section: Job Title: Quantity Surveyor I Role Summary: This role involves managing the contractual and financial aspects of construction projects to ensure projects remain within budget, including cost valuation, budgeting, and reporting for clients and internal management. Expectations: 2-5 years relevant industry experience. Knowledge of ARM4 & ARM5. Key Responsibilities: - Prepare cost management control budgets. - Support cost management programs
Birmingham, United kingdom
On site
Junior
15-03-2026